Retrieved from http://theawakenedstate.tumblr.com/post/49441933014/can-we-control-our-thoughts-why-do-thoughts-pop
In our Learning Theories class, we
have explored the meaning of education, perspectives on knowledge and
perspectives on learning. We have had in
depth discussions around epistemologies (which
I can now pronounce), learning theories as well as learning strategies and styles. A recurring theme throughout these discussions
has been that our epistemologies, or views on knowing, are at the core of how
we learn, teach and with how we approach research.
In my final paper for Learning
Theories, I have described myself as an experiential cognitivist. Now I know what some of you might be thinking…you
might be thinking that experiential belongs with constructivism, not
cognitivism. According to many theorists
and researchers, you are right….experiential learning is often discussed in
conjunction to constructivism. Linda Harasim (2012) described experiential learning
in the context of constructivism as learning through experience and
interactions with others. However, my personal
identification with experiential learning has a cognitivist twist.
In both cognitivism and
constructivism, the learner is active.
In cognitivism however, knowledge is acquired and built on a foundation through individual reflection and evaluation of experiences, as opposed to
being created through social interaction, as per constructivist
learning.
As I have reflected on my assumptions
about knowledge, learning and teaching and connected it with readings on those
subjects, I have come to recognize some of my personal values regarding
knowledge. I value individual reflection
and find that I require the time to think about things and make connections
internally, before I feel like I can effectively engage with others on a
subject. I value process, structure and
organization. To deepen my comprehension on a subject, I need to experience it in
some way. This may entail making
connections through trial and error (and reflecting on the experience),
organizing information, which often involves color coding, or creating a visual
doodles that can help me connect with my prior knowledge.
My position as an experiential
cognitivist truly is at the core of how I work and learn. It also influences how I teach, however,
there is a time and place for everything and I recognize that different
subjects and different students require different approaches. My tendency as a teacher is to shift along
the cognitivist-constructivist spectrum, towards constructivism. I encourage interaction and collaboration in
the classroom between me and the students and amongst the students
themselves. As students progress in the
program, my teaching objectives evolve from strategies for students to acquire
foundational knowledge, to applying and creating new knowledge.
“As an
experiential cognitivist, I understand knowledge as a series of internal
connections that are made through experience” (Kemp, 2015, p.8 ). I can relate my way of knowing to previous
and current experiences of learning and of teaching. Through this research and reflection I have
also developed an understanding of various other epistemologies, learning
theories and strategies and have had stimulating discussions with my cohort about
where some of these concepts fit and how they are related with one
another.
Harasim, L.
(2012). Learning theory and online technologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kemp, L.
(2015). My personal epistemological position.
Royal Roads LRNT501
No comments:
Post a Comment